Aside from the slightly surreal fact that it was Chelsea Clinton doing the work, the report was straight out of the feel-good news playbook. [HuffPo]
Rather, what was surprising to see on Monday night’s show is how someone can be on TV in such a prominent way and, in her big moment, display so very little charisma — none at all. Either we’re spoiled by TV’s unlimited population of giant personalities or this woman is one of the most boring people of her era. [WashPo]
Ms. Clinton is a little self-conscious on camera and doesn’t have the kind of richly modulated anchor voice most television reporters acquire, but that actually gave her piece a more natural feel — like a video blog on Current TV. [NYT]
Chelsea doesn’t “pop” off the screen, to use an industry term—her demeanor is reserved, she doesn’t project her voice like a broadcaster. Not that most viewers probably cared. [DailyBeast]
Her voice — the first time most of us have even heard it — was pleasing and plummy, but monochromatic. [NewsDay]
It looks like she has some work to do if she wants to impress her new ‘colleagues.’ But only time will tell to see where Chelsea lands at the end of her three-month contract.